Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Compucredit Holdings Corporation v. Akanthos Capital Management, LLC, 11-13254 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-13254 Visitors: 9
Judges: Dubina, Chief Judge, and Tjoflat, Edmondson, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus, Wilson, Pryor, Martin and Jordan, Circuit Judges
Filed: Apr. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 677 F.3d 1042 (2012) COMPUCREDIT HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AKANTHOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, Aria Opportunity Fund Ltd., AQR Absolute Return Master Account, L.P., CC Arbitrage, Ltd., CNH CA Master Account, L.P., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 11-13254. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 16, 2012. Emmet J. Bondurant, Jason James Carter, Michael A. Caplan, Frank M. Lowrey, IV, Bondurant, Mixon & Elmore, LLP, Lisa L. Heller, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Cires
More
677 F.3d 1042 (2012)

COMPUCREDIT HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AKANTHOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, Aria Opportunity Fund Ltd., AQR Absolute Return Master Account, L.P., CC Arbitrage, Ltd., CNH CA Master Account, L.P., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-13254.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 16, 2012.

Emmet J. Bondurant, Jason James Carter, Michael A. Caplan, Frank M. Lowrey, IV, Bondurant, Mixon & Elmore, LLP, Lisa L. Heller, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, Atlanta, GA, E. Casey Beckett, Christopher W. Madel, Randall Tietjen, K. Craig Wildfang, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Karen B. Bragman, Kevin B. Getzendanner, Heather Smith Michael, Arnall, Golden & Gregory, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Harry N. Niska, Kelly K. Pierce, Jeff I. Ross, Ross & Orenstein, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants-Appellees.

*1043 Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 661 F.3d 1312.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer